Product updates / Prompt

Prompt: explain an API version transition

Show the specific contract difference developers must understand. This generic brief concerns the reader's API and does not claim an Animro API, integration or automatic migration capability.

By AnimroUpdated 2 min readAI-assisted · independently agent-reviewed

Who this is for: Product teams briefing an accurate and useful update explanation.

What to prepare

  • Approved old and new API contract examples.
  • The affected version, fields and transition instructions.
  • Verified deadlines, compatibility boundaries and documentation.

Copyable creative brief

An authored planning example. Replace illustrative details with your approved product facts and assets.

Create a 30-second planning explainer for a fictional API transition. Use owner-supplied request and response excerpts, with secrets removed and sample identifiers clearly labeled. Present the old and new version names side by side. Highlight only the changed field, required parameter or response shape established by the release record. Keep unrelated code dimmed but readable enough to provide context. Explain the developer's required adjustment using the approved migration wording. Do not invent endpoint paths, SDK behavior, backward compatibility or automatic conversion. If a cutoff exists, show its verified event and date. End on the new contract excerpt, the supplied validation check and the actual migration-documentation destination. Treat the examples as illustrative contract communication, not executed requests or test results unless execution evidence is provided.

Make it your own

Contract difference
Supply the exact changed request or response requirement.
Safe examples
Use approved sanitized excerpts with no credentials.
Transition scope
State version compatibility and dates only as verified.

Select the smallest meaningful example

Include enough context to interpret the changed field, but do not scroll through an entire specification. Ask the API owner to verify that the excerpt remains valid when shortened. Omitted fields should not make an incomplete request look executable.

Adapt to a field, authentication or behavior change

A renamed field needs a mapping; a changed requirement needs a prerequisite; a changed response behavior needs a bounded example. Do not reuse the same arrow treatment if it obscures the decision developers must make.

Repair false execution evidence

A green response panel can imply a request was tested. Label conceptual examples and avoid fabricated latency or status results. The final validation instruction must come from the migration guide rather than a guessed command.

Review checklist

  • The contract excerpts are approved and sanitized.
  • The version labels and changed fields are exact.
  • No example is presented as executed without evidence.
  • Compatibility and migration instructions are not invented.
Explore product updates ↗