Who this is for: Launch teams preparing reliable product communication and reusable production assets.
What to prepare
- The published video and editable source references
- Current product behavior and availability
- A scene-to-asset register
- The destinations using the video or its derivatives
Separate evergreen ideas from change-sensitive facts
A recognizable user problem may remain useful while release-day wording becomes obsolete. Interface controls, eligibility, pricing references and roadmap status can change independently. Mark those dependencies at the scene level.
In an illustrative launch, scene 1 explains a handoff problem, scene 2 shows an owner menu, scene 3 shows the assigned state and scene 4 says “Coming soon.” If public availability changes, the close needs revision. If the owner menu moves, the demonstration may need new assets even though the problem still makes sense.
Fill a maintenance register
Record the scene, factual dependency, review trigger, source owner and planned action. This keeps maintenance focused on meaning rather than refreshing dates for appearance.
- Problem scene: depends on the task remaining relevant; review if positioning changes; keep if it still describes the intended viewer.
- Action scene: depends on current controls and permissions; review on the relevant UI release; replace outdated screens and recheck continuity.
- Proof scene: depends on the actual result and status wording; review if behavior changes; revise the claim when necessary.
- Closing scene: depends on availability and destination; review when access changes; update status throughout the asset, not just the link.
- Derived clips: depend on the original scene's facts; identify every reuse so the correction reaches all published variants.
Decide whether to revise, reframe or retire
Revise when the central promise remains true and a small number of assets or labels changed. Reframe when the product now serves a different task or audience. Retire an asset when its premise is no longer accurate and a small correction would leave a misleading story.
Do not preserve old footage simply because it was expensive to produce. A polished obsolete interface can teach the wrong action. If it is kept as historical material, make the date and context clear rather than presenting it as a current demonstration.
After editing, repeat the relevant final-artifact checks. New copy can alter timing; a new screen can change cropping; a new CTA can lead to a different destination. Record the substantive revision and its reason.
Maintain the scene register beside source references so another producer can find the right material. A reliable update process begins with knowing which published claims depend on which product facts.
Review checklist
- Change-sensitive scenes have named dependencies.
- Availability changes are reflected throughout the film.
- Reused clips are included in the maintenance scope.
- Revisions are checked in the actual final artifact.
- Substantive updates are distinguished from cosmetic date changes.