Who this is for: Motion producers writing precise creative and educational briefs.
What to prepare
- Two approved translations and language identifiers
- Fonts covering both scripts
- Separate line-break maps and a language reviewer
Copyable creative brief
An authored planning example. Replace illustrative details with your approved product facts and assets.
Create a 15-second two-language typographic study using LANGUAGE_A_TEXT and LANGUAGE_B_TEXT exactly as supplied. These are approved translations, not a request to invent or improve wording. Use separate LINE_MAP_A and LINE_MAP_B with complete phrase groups. Verify each required glyph and punctuation mark in FONT_ASSETS; flag missing coverage or shaping concerns before animation. Show the first language as a complete readable composition with its language label. End its reading hold before replacing it with the second language. Use a controlled cut or restrained opacity change between complete phrases. Do not morph individual letters, scramble word order, animate joined-script characters independently or retain fragments from both languages as accidental mixed copy. Keep a stable brand or layout anchor where useful, but allow the text regions to differ in height and line count. Show the second language in its approved layout and finish with a complete reading hold. If both versions are compared side by side, provide enough space for each at a usable size. Record any proposed reflow for language-review approval.
Make it your own
- LANGUAGE_A_TEXT and LANGUAGE_B_TEXT
- Paste approved copy and identify each language.
- LINE_MAP_A and LINE_MAP_B
- Provide intentional complete-phrase breaks independently.
- FONT_ASSETS
- Identify exact files and weights with coverage for the required scripts.
- REPLACEMENT_STYLE
- Choose a cut or restrained whole-phrase transition with no letter morph.
Prepare a controlled example
An illustrative study can compare approved English “Make room for ideas” with approved Slovak “Dajte priestor nápadom.” The point is layout, not translation authority. Have the actual project wording reviewed and use those approved strings. The longer phrase may need a different break while preserving a similar hierarchy.
Adapt to unlike writing systems
Allow direction, alignment and shaping to follow the approved language layout. A persistent logo can connect the two compositions while text positions change. If the same visual box forces one language into tiny type, use separate views instead of pretending identical geometry is required.
Correct substitution and mixed states
If a glyph switches style, inspect the actual font assets and fallback behavior. If both phrases overlap into unreadable mixed text, shorten or remove the overlap. If a mask clips accents, expand its bounds. Reinspect the encoded frames after language edits rather than carrying over the previous approval.
Review checklist
- Both translations are supplied and approved.
- Each language has its own line map.
- No intermediate frame invents mixed wording.
- Glyphs and accents survive the encoded transition.