Who this is for: Teams explaining multi-stage product tasks.
What to prepare
- Complete verified workflow
- Checkpoint acceptance conditions
- Role and setup prerequisites
- Final-state evidence
Scene-by-scene storyboard
60-second planning sequence · illustrative copy and visual direction
- 01
0–8s
State prerequisites
Show the configured contributor account, sample assets and required reviewer access.
On screen:Start: account, assets and reviewer ready
- 02
8–19s
Prepare the request
Enter the sample title and required content using the actual creation flow.
On screen:Checkpoint 1 · Request prepared
- 03
19–29s
Confirm scope and recipient
Show the consequential destination and reviewer choices with exact product labels.
On screen:Checkpoint 2 · Scope and reviewer checked
- 04
29–39s
Inspect the preview
Open the real preview or review screen and compare key values with the brief.
On screen:Checkpoint 3 · Preview inspected
- 05
39–49s
Commit the submission
Perform the actual submit and any confirmation steps. Preserve pending feedback distinctly.
On screen:Submit the sample request
- 06
49–57s
Verify the saved result
Locate the resulting identifier, recipient and submitted status in the actual destination.
On screen:Checkpoint 4 · Submission verified
- 07
57–60s
Close with the next boundary
Hold the submitted object and make clear that reviewer action is later.
On screen:Submitted · Review decision still pending
Make it your own
- Workflow prerequisites
- Supply the actual starting account, permissions, assets and recipient conditions.
- Checkpoint criteria
- Define an observable acceptance state for each meaningful stage.
- Final boundary
- State the exact confirmed endpoint, distinguishing submission from later review or approval.
Prepare checkpoint evidence
Define what must be true at each checkpoint and supply a source screen. Do not use stage labels to hide required decisions. A preview checkpoint is inappropriate if the actual product has no preview; substitute an evidenced inspection step.
Adapt the complexity
For 30 seconds, demonstrate one checkpoint as a separate focused video rather than rushing the whole chain. For another workflow, choose checkpoints based on meaningful state changes, not arbitrary equal divisions of time.
Review the final boundary
Submission and approval are different outcomes. The final claim should match the actual observed state. Trace one stable sample identifier where possible and state when an object receives its identifier only after saving.
Review checklist
- Every checkpoint has observable evidence.
- Consequential choices remain visible.
- The final state is not overstated as later approval.