Who this is for: Teams explaining AI-assisted work in their products.
What to prepare
- Exact source input
- Labeled draft
- Visible edit evidence
- Specific review criterion
Scene-by-scene storyboard
60-second planning sequence · illustrative copy and visual direction
- 01
0–8s
Set the task
Show the request to summarize a short sample note. Label the material illustrative.
On screen:Summarize the next action
- 02
8–18s
Inspect the input
Hold The sample inspection is Friday. An owner has not been assigned.
On screen:Source: owner not yet assigned
- 03
18–28s
Show the example draft
Display Example coordinator will inspect the sample Friday, clearly labeled as an illustrative AI draft.
On screen:Example draft · Requires review
- 04
28–40s
Check the claim
Align the draft owner with the source’s unassigned owner and identify the mismatch.
On screen:The source does not name an owner
- 05
40–50s
Correct the sentence
Show the human edit to The sample inspection is Friday; owner to be assigned.
On screen:Correct the unsupported owner
- 06
50–56s
Inspect the reviewed result
Hold the corrected text and the specific review criterion.
On screen:Checked against this source note
- 07
56–60s
Bound the approval
Keep the final label limited to the shown example and check.
On screen:Reviewed for this example
Make it your own
- Source and selected draft
- Use exact input and output with provenance, example labels and relevant retry or selection context.
- Review criterion
- Choose a concrete source mismatch or requested style change that can be inspected.
- Correction and final label
- Show the actual edit and limit the approval wording to the check demonstrated.
Prepare review evidence
Supply the input, selected output and actual editing states, or label the entire screen sequence as a concept. Preserve any selection or retry context. A hypothetical error must not be presented as a recorded incident.
Adapt the check
A tone revision can compare the draft with an explicit style request. A factual revision needs source evidence. For 30 seconds, use one short source sentence and one correction while retaining the initial and final labels.
Review product claims
This storyboard explains the reader’s AI workflow, not an Animro summarization integration. Avoid quality guarantees, broad accuracy badges or claims that human review eliminates all errors. The shown check supports only the specific correction.
Review checklist
- The draft is clearly an example.
- The correction is tied to source evidence.
- The final approval claim is bounded.